Why Grandma, What A Terrible Movie You've Made!
A Review by Ben Hunter
1 Out of 5 Stars
A film with a GREAT premise,
and a terrible execution of that premise.
Red Riding Hood is about a
girl named Valerie, Amanda Seyfried, who lives in a fantasy pre-historic little
town in the middle of the forest. Since
they can remember, the town is plagued by a "wolf" that’s been
haunting them. At a last straw, the
men of the town decide to hunt the wolf after it takes the life of one of their
loved ones, Valerie's sister. The
town comes to find out that the wolf they capture isn't the real wolf. Father Solomon, Gary Oldman, hears
about the troubles of the town as he lived in a town similar that was haunted
by a wolf as well. So he informs
them that the wolf, just like the one his town was haunted by, is really one of
the townspeople and one of them transforms and becomes the wolf in the full
moon light. So the mystery begins,
as everyone looks at the other, in suspicion of who the wolf really is!
As I mentioned, a GREAT
premise. The way I just described
it, from the trailer, the movie poster (the one sheet/key art) which all depict
the way I just described it, really gets one interested in viewing this
film. But I had my doubts going
into this, because the director, Catherine Hardwicke, directed the first
installment of the Twilight
Saga. If this film was anything
like the Twilight films, I knew Red
Riding Hood was going to be terrible
just like they were. So
"perfectly" made forest sets and log cabins were filled in this story. Perfectly pale white skin on all the
young teen actors, etc. It was Twilight all over again from the cheesy teen romance in the beginning.
The producers and people
behind the marketing of this film were blinded by the money they could make off
of it, as the Twilight films made
a lot of money touching the hearts of women all over the world. Giving them that escape and sense of
fantasy in which they seek in girl films, "chick flicks". But this isn't a chick flick! We all grew up with this fairytale and
it should've been made and marketed for general audiences. Instead the filmmakers ruined it with
cheesy Twilight teen
romance. Valerie is torn between
the boy she really loves and the boy her family has set for her to marry
because he's economically better for her family.
KNOW WHO YOU'RE MAKING YOUR
MOVIE FOR! If you want to make it
a teen movie, then go all out and do that! From the trailer and key art it looks more of an older family
movie. The type of movie where mom
and dad can see it and be entertained but their teen children can love it as
well. There were senior citizens
(who the majority kept checking their phones throughout) in the theater I saw
the film in, as well as a lot of the older generation, people of my parents'
era and above. So the marketing of
this movie was just terribly wrong as it attracted everyone but was made for
younger audiences. So with my
bashing of Twilight, if you were
a fan of those films, as they made a lot of money and a lot of people did like
them, you'll probably enjoy Red Riding Hood.
So you're sold on this idea;
you think it's great because you're blinded by the great premise, it'll make a
lot of money and appeal to girls like Twilight did, fine.
Directing is universal in the fact that regardless of the genre, good
directing can be quite clear as well as bad directing (in addition to weak
writing which this film had both poor directing and writing). So some of shots that Hardwicke decided
to go with were very questionable.
For instance, how she decided to show someone being killed while on the
ground when they know they're going to their death. It felt like she straddled the fence here. Either show the gore, or cleverly with
your editing and music put the illusion of death in our minds. Set up the kill and let our
imaginations do the rest since this film is PG-13 and not rated R.
The reveal of the wolf
should've been more theatrical and cinematic ... the wolf just appeared. It was great that we didn't see it in
the first big wolf scene, but when it was time to reveal the wolf, I wanted
more creativity! Valerie
communicates with the wolf in this scene and the movie then became VERY
expositional or preachy as one would say from then on. "Don't forget about this
fact! I want you to remember this
so I'm going to remind you about it!
And then keep reminding you about it!" I just shook my head in disapproval.
The acting wasn't what I
wanted it to be either. Amanda
Seyfried wasn't as emotionally compelling as I would have liked her to be to
carry this film as its lead. Not
even Julie Christie stood out.
Gary Oldman was the only actor that really gave a great performance and
strung the movie along to keep my interest. But since the writing suffered, the filmmakers ruined it
with the writing of his character.
The mystery of the wolf that begins when Gary Oldman's character is
introduced is really the only good thing about this film. It's what helps keep it together and
not make one walk out on it. That and Gary Oldman's actual performance were the
glue that kept the film together, saving it from a complete disaster. Even in the end I just kept saying,
"Please don't end this with a modern day, teen, pop rock song"; and
sure enough, that's what happened!
So to summarize, the film
was marketed wrong. Don't make a
variation of the next Twilight
movie just to make money. This is
a great example of going the more quality film route to reach true lovers of
film and make a lot of money that way.
Instead of "selling out" to cater to a particular demographic
just so you can make a ton of money, and hide behind it saying the criticism
you receive doesn't matter because you broke the bank with all the money you've
made. If that's the route you want
to take, then own it! Don't
straddle the fence! I can at least
respect the Twilight films for
owning it and not trying to be something they're not.
Red Riding Hood
Fantasy, 100 Minutes,
PG-13
Written by: David Johnson
Directed by: Catherine
Hardwicke
Cast: Amanda Seyfried,
Lukas Haas, and Gary Oldman
Comments
Post a Comment